B: You are now experiencing in your civilization things that other civilizations take eons to learn. But, because you have decided you are strong enough to accelerate the process but experiencing ‘high’ and ‘low’, now you have arrived at a time where you can balance that out, where you can still contain the knowledge of knowing that the negative choices are always there, and that the negative possibilities are always there, and you can understand that sometimes even a negative possibility can be transformed into a positive result. Now is the time for you to also know that you can learn what you need to learn through joy, and through excitement. It can be done. It is not an esoteric principle. It is not, as you say, an ‘airy philosophy’. It is actual substance. Joy, itself, and love, itself, is what you are made of. Literally. It is the substance itself of Creation. That’s what love is. That is why ‘being in love’ means that what you have done is synchronized with the Prime Vibration of Existence. You say, "everything works when you are in love." The idea is to understand that you need to be totally in love with yourself and All That Is. Then, your world will be the garden that it is. Because, we see it that way. And, if you choose to see it that way yourself, we and all the civilizations in the Association of Worlds, will be more than delighted to share our garden with you.

A: Regarding the ‘battle’ between right and wrong…

B: Positive and negative…remember that the terms ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ are subjective value judgments, and to say that something is ‘right’ doesn’t necessarily mean that it involves positive energy. To say that something is ‘wrong’ doesn’t necessarily mean that it involves negative energy.

A: Now, the word ‘integrity’ pretty much means that you are pursuing something with ‘sincerity’ and an element of ‘rightness’.

B: All right.

A: We go through our various lifetimes and do some awful things and sometimes have some awful things done to us. We murder, and we get murdered. Is there such a thing as ‘murdering with integrity’? Is there a core ‘rightness’ that is really an ‘objective rightness’ about the Universe?

B: There are always circumstances which in your terminology are exceptions to the rule. The idea simply is to understand that in most place the concept, the circumstances that are created that allow for the concept you call ‘murder’ to occur are usually, more often than not, at least 99.99% of the time, the result of originally ‘negative’, limiting definitions in which one arrives at a place in which ‘murder’ is the ‘only way out’. This is usually the result of having taken a ‘negative’ step to begin with. However, there can be an exception. Again, your society is now exploring the idea that you call ‘mercy killing’. The idea of someone riddled with a disease so crippling that in your terminology, it would be ‘of benefit to them’ to allow them to die, rather than keeping them alive.

Many in your society see this as ‘murder’, and you can look at it that way, if you wish. But, the idea is while there may be circumstances even in that situation that are negative, there can also be circumstances that are positive. Each and every circumstance must be evaluated based on the circumstances in that particular event. There is no one general idea that will cover every situation, of course. You can say, however, that more often than not, if an individual finds himself in a position where they must force their reality on another individual to the point where life is forfeit, then the momentum that brought each of them there generally was probably based on original negative assumptions, because you never have to force anything on anyone in order to have the reality that you desire. Do you follow me?

A: Yes. So you are saying that the premise is that there is no ‘core rightness’ that can accommodate all circumstances in All That Is?

B: Only in the sense that if what you wish is an integrated reality, then only the tools and approaches that are reflective of that integrity are used. In that sense, you can say that there is a ‘core rightness’ for the particular type of reality that you desire. If you want ‘this result’, then do not do anything that is not representative of that result. In other words, the ‘means’ and the ‘ends’ are the same thing, and are not separable.

I would remind you that the ideas that are being discussed may, in your terms, push many buttons, and may bring certain ideas to the surface, and may cause emotional fluctuation. That is all right, and that is a part of learning and a part of life. The ideas that we are expressing are ideas that work in our society. They are ideas that we perceive can work in your society because we know that your society is similar to ours, in many ways, and is moving in directions that are similar to directions we have moved in. So, we know that some of the ideas we are sharing can work for you. But, once again, at no time are you expected to adopt 100% any notion or idea or approach that we share. What we are sharing is something that works for us. Examine it, at your own pace, and decide if it works for you.

A: One event on this planet that is causing some excitement is happening in London with a Pakistani individual called Maitreya, who is said to be representing ‘an unfoldment of Christ’…

B: In a sense. The idea of what you term in your language, ‘the second coming’, is not something that will be manifest in a single individual, but in the awakening of that spirit of consciousness within every individual, because that consciousness is the same thing as the ‘world spirit’. Many single individuals can and will manifest it, perhaps in an accelerated form, because the reality in which you now live will allow this form to be more accelerated. So, you may find that the vibration you call ‘Maitreya’ will be one gate through which this energy can express itself, but that doesn’t mean that it cannot express itself through any of you.

A: It seems we have over the centuries put the emphasis not on the teaching, but on the teacher.

B: Yes. The idea of this consciousness is that it not so much wanted ‘followers’, but that each and every one of you were ‘Christ consciousnesses’. The idea of ‘following the way’ is not a matter of being subservient, but being equal, and reflective. Being that energy that was being demonstrated. That is the ‘way’.

A: How about the Course in Miracles?

B: The world spirit did communicate that work, but there will always be some filtration that will be some interpretation in the symbology of those through which the information came, so that you can relate to it. It simply is not in the form that you would perceive it were you a nonphysical being. Being a physical being brings with it certain parameters that must change any communication from a non-physical to a physical state in ways that allow you to even understand the concepts. So, sometimes you will find that certain ideas will be presented, and they may have a certain coloration. It doesn’t mean that it is literally the only way to relate to it. It simply means that the individuals that brought that forth are of a particular vibration, and that other individuals are of that same vibration, that they will relate to those symbols, and therefore in that format the information perhaps will have the widest appeal for the particular vibration it was intended for.

A: What does the manifestation of the vibration of ‘christ consciousness’ now, in history, mean?

B: It tells you that you have reached the end of a cycle, and that you are now beginning to remember who you are. If you want to find the idea of the embodiment of this, go home and look into a mirror, and then start acting as if you are that embodiment, and you will be fulfilling the idea

A: How about personalities who exemplify this vibration in a historical sense?

B: Sometimes they are concentrations of focus of the world spirit as an action in an archetypal or symbological way, so that they will function as a reflection of the state of the world at that time. Do you follow? They are projections of the world spirit.

A: And these can take place at any time?

B: It is always ongoing. Remember that it is a living idea. The past is only an illusion anyway. You create it with your ideas of space and time. It is all existing right now.

A: I have had several experiences in which I began to have an out-of-body experience, and when I start to leave my body, I get very frightened, and feel that I won’t be safe and won’t be able to get back.

B: Yes, yes. Why do you believe that you will not be safe or that you will not come back?

A: I guess from stories I’ve heard and from thing’s I’ve read. However, this has been my main goal, to have these experiences and not be afraid.

B: All right. May I ask you a question?

A: Yes.

B: Do you believe, to the best of your ability, that everything you choose to do is being done for a positive reason?

A: Yes, I do.

B: Then, do you not understand that if you are that vibration, nothing that is not that vibration can even find you, let alone touch you?

A: That’s it.

B: Yes, that’s it. One of the most important things of all has just been demonstrated by this individual. It is that simple.

A: Are we the least evolved planet in the universe?

B: No, no, no. You are nowhere near the bottom and nowhere near the top, but in the middle. So are we, from our perspective. However, your civilization (1988) is right on the edge of transforming into a very strong, peaceful and creative world. In that sense, understand this. Even though your planet seems to be going through much turmoil, remember that transformation is not the product of mediocrity. As strong as your planet has been in the negative side, that is an indication of how strong it can be on the positive side, once it let’s go of the negative and snaps into the positive side. We are aware of several civilizations that make yours look like a picnic.

A: Apparently we all have a higher self…

B: Apparently…this chatter must be coming from somewhere….

A: Yes. What I would like to know is…I think I’ve met my higher self…

B: You think?

A: Yes.

B: You’re not sure?

A: Pretty sure.

B: All right.

A: I would like to know if we share our higher selves with other people.

B: You can in the sense of what is called an oversoul manifestation. In your terminology, it is where one soul can "split" itself into many different persona, fragments, that will appear to be separate individuals, but who share the same soul. To some degree, those individuals would, in a sense, share the same ‘higher self’. The concept of ‘higher self’ and ‘oversoul’ is rather shady, in terms of separating them out as distinct ideas. They can be separate, but that is a matter of definition, and relates to the ideas and purposes involved with what you want to do. So, the answer is yes, although precise individual personas will usually have a higher self that is, shall we say, ‘assigned’ by the oversoul to that particular persona to function as a ‘guide’, or a carrier wave, that allows you to tap into that source to remain ‘true’ to the vibration that represents your chosen purposes. Does that help?

A: When two people have a telepathic bond….

B: What you call ‘telepathy’ is actually tel-empathy, which means you are vibrating in a similar wavelength to someone else, and therefore you are translating thoughts in the same way. You are not actually ‘reading their mind’, but you are having the same thought at the same time because you are on the same frequency. Individuals that are ‘split off’ from one basic ‘soul self’ will very often have a tendency to operate on similar frequencies, and will already have that telepathic bond.

A: Do we share that with other entities?

B: Everyone is a ‘teacher’ and a ‘server’ on many different levels. You are, to some degree, the ‘higher self’ of other kinds of entities in other dimensions.

A: I am involved in relationship…

B: Involved in a relationship. All right. Quite a mouthfull.

A: My partner, I believe, is passing on. He is very ill. I wonder if there is anything you could tell me that would help me (crying) and that would help him.

B: We already understand that you have love. A: Yes …

B: May I ask you a question?

A: Yes… B: All right. Do you believe that consciousness can be physical and non-physical?

A: Yes.

B: You’re sure?

A: Yes.

B: Do you believe that what you call ‘physical death’ is simply a change of state?

A: Yes.

B: Do you believe that an individual who has made connections can always feel and experience communication along those established lines, even if the state changes?

A: Yes.

B: Do you also, at the same time, understand that the choice the choice the individual has made, or is making, in changing that state, means that they have a timing to fulfill in their own right, in their own responsibility, and that they have other things to do – a new ‘job’ to go to?

A: Yes.

B: And, that from time to time they will also be busy doing what they are doing? I do not mean to make ‘light’ of this, but I will simply interject now, for general purposes, that we have perceived that many individuals in the physical plane, on your planet, when they think about individuals who have physically ‘died’, assume that they have nothing better to do than hang around waiting for you to talk to them, or them to talk to you. They are very busy, and they have lives and things to learn. Now, they will form a broader perspective, generally, because that is the nature of non-physical focus. This means that time, for them, is also very different, almost non-existent in the sense that you understand time. An individual in non-physical state can feel that perhaps 30 minutes has passed, yet when they turn their attention back to the physical world a year has passed.

Such is the difference in the time frames between physical and non-physical reality. If you do not feel the individual around all the time, do not despair. I will tell you this. If you send that individual a ‘loving connection’ every time you think of that individual, then it puts you on the level of that individual. They will receive it. They will use the energy in whatever way it assists them in whatever way they have to learn. They will send energy back to assist you. The relationship does not end. It only changes. You can be very aware of communication, but you do not have to feel ‘torn apart’.

Your society is beginning to learn that what you call physical and non-physical reality does not have to be a barrier between experiences. It may be at first easier to have these communications in your dream state, which is on a level similar to that of a non-physical being, and therefore communication is easier. Because communication might occur many times in ways you are not used to, many times you will find that it is easier for them to send you a message by simply allowing you to see something, but gently directing you in physical life toward something that will boldly remind you of them. Very often, those types of ‘coincidences’ are communications, to let you know they’re doing fine, and they’re thinking of you. But, it is sometimes easier to get your attention by using the tools you have at hand.

Now, it is only because of the way you have been taught that you consider ‘change’ as a loss, instead of understanding that the change cannot only incorporate what you have had, but more, and that it can become greater than anything you could imagine. You can cherish it on a whole new level. Does this help you?

A: Yes, it does. Is he going to be able to make this transition with peace in his heart?

B: Yes, if you will give him that love beginning now. See, in your mind’s eye, the transition being peaceful. See a brilliant transparent blue-white light infusing this individual. See golden, rosy, warmth entering the heart. Let the individual know they can be at peace. Let him know that physical death is truly not very much different than stepping through a doorway from one room to another in a big house.