Responsibility, Ethics and Honesty in Social Institutions
A Reasonable Objective for the 21st Century

Our social systems are (in effect) having their own Near Death Experience. We're beginning to recognize our paradigm filters, finding out how we got them, and deciding what they mean for us now. It's not pretty.  Social filters say, for instance, that it's all right for groups to behave in ways that individuals cannot. Systems play be their own rules. If a group or institution says "wrong is right", "that's the way it is".

Governments can decimate people if it wants their land, minerals, resources, or wants to enslave them for labour, but when individuals do this it's murder, theft, kidnapping or torture. Congress exempted itself for decades from laws applying to everyone else. Schools develop policies to humiliate students, beginning with swallowing John Locke's "tabula rasa" concept  - that students are "stupid and useless until 'teachers' fill their heads with 'facts' -- and extending to ridicule and beatings.  However, if individuals regularly belittled and beat each other, no one would call it education; quite the contrary, they would be arrested for harassment and assault.

Churches insult people publicly and call it redemption. People turn up to announce that if everyone elses spirituality doesn't match theirs, everyone is "going to hell", and they'd have plenty of institutional backing to say so.  Many churches worked to destroy the American Indian way of life [ not to mention other people's way of life as well ]  "in the name of savings souls for god". People can't make friends behaving in this way -- only a lot of enemies.

A collective "near death experience" may be just what we need to observe, evaluate, and evolve our systems' paradigm filters -- to apply to the systems the same yardstick that we apply to ourselves.   However, change doesn't have to involve trauma, except by choice.

From The Paradigm Conspiracy