 |
Chapter 1 - Recovery: The Art of Paradigm Shifts
 |
The Global Crisis of
Addictions
 |
Caught in Deadly Processes
 |
Substance addictions |
 |
Process addictions
 |
Addiction to:
 |
Working, winning, high stress, relationships
fast track jobs, getting fame, etc. |
|
 |
The most "lauded" activities turn into addictive
patterns
 |
Religion, scientific study, academic inquiry, government
service.
 |
Religion turns into obsession |
 |
Scientific study turns into dogma. |
 |
Systems of scientific research has its own brand of
obsessive-complusive behavior. |
 |
Academic inquiry becomes a "in-your-head" addiction |
 |
Government service becomes power addiction |
|
|
 |
Process addictions are as deadly as substance addictions,
because they underline substance addictions and just about every social and global ill we
have. |
|
|
 |
Addict-Making Systems
 |
Family dynamics, school rules, workplace polcies and
practices, corporate hierarchies, government workings, media messages, cultural and
religious belief systems -- all operate in ways that set us up to behave addictively.
Society itself is an "addictive" system. |
|
|
 |
The Paradigm Conspiracy
 |
Enter "Paradigms"
 |
Thomas Khun introduced the term "paradigm" in The
Structure of Scientific Revolutions in 1962. |
 |
To raise "paradigm issues" is to reflect on the
ideas or concepts we're using as our map of reality our worldview, life perspective,
philosophy, or mental model. It is the blueprint we use to build our world in our mind. |
 |
Paradigms usually begin with the institution of some
"exemplary model" that weaves together theories, "standards" and
methods in a way that seems to make the best sense at the time. |
|
 |
Developments within a
paradigm
 |
Developments occurring within the framework of a paradigm
 |
Example: "normal science", where the paradigm gets
so comfortable it becomes invisible, and practitioners operate within a mental model and
pursue it to the nth degree. Becoming "healthy" is adjusting to the paradigm's
definition of "healthy". |
|
 |
Developments which check the paradigm and create a new
paradigm. |
|
 |
Paradigm Shifts
 |
Revolutionary development comes when the paradigm reaches a
CRISIS, in that it doesn't solve problems the same any more. Anomalies relative to the
paradigm begin to accumulate. Scientists begin to freak out as everything they ever
learned is called into question. They believe that a new paradigm is not needed, that we
just have to "make the one we have work better", and that "when things
don't work, "something must be wrong with us". |
 |
The more the paradigm fails to do its job, the more
old-paradigm scientists try to make it work. |
 |
The paradigm is ready for a revolution, but because
old-paradigm scientists have forgotten that they even have a paradigm, scientists conclude
instead that their world is falling apart, and that alternative ways of doing science
don't exist. They are too bound to the paradigm to notice they are stumbling over their
own models. |
|
 |
Paradigms can cause
"soul-abusive" systems -- OUR CURRENT SYSTEM
 |
Today we are not experiencing paradigm norms as healthy,
either personally or globally. The blueprint for our social structure, families,
governments, schools and businesses is not working well at all. It is causing out shared
social systems to function abusively and to make us sick, physically and
psychologically, as well. |
 |
The people who control the failing paradigm respond
in specific ways
 |
Blame certain people and label them
"troublemakers"
 |
"It's the ________ people that have to be restrained. |
|
 |
"We need more discipline and more restraint" |
 |
"We need more jails and longer jail sentences" |
 |
"We need to take away people's defensive weapons" |
 |
"We need more testing" |
 |
"We need more laws with stricter enforcement" |
 |
Coming down on people in the current paradigm isn't
considered abuse |
 |
"If things don't work the answer is to take away more
rights and make more laws" |
|
|
 |
The Paradigm of Control and
"Power-Over" Model THE CONTROL PARADIGM MODEL
 |
What kind of healthy social "paradigm"
requires that we blame individuals, intimidate and punish them in order to keep our
"social systems" healthy? The overall pattern has to do with CONTROL. |
 |
Domination is the paradigm's driving issue. |
 |
According to the model, "if somebody doesn't control
us, our social systems will fall into chaos" |
 |
Paradigm model "authorities" believe that
"nothing would work if we each did our own thing, and to have order, society must do
what "the authorities" tell us to do. |
|
 |
The Soul :
The Big Threat
 |
To be controlled, we have to be unplugged from competing
sources of control. The major threat to external control is our internal
guidance system - our Soul, the core of who we are, our deep
presence, our inner connectedness to the Creative Force in the Universe. It's our direct
link to reality. This core is the souce of our talent and the wellspring of creativity. |
 |
To the control paradigm, the Soul is
the enemy - what has to be removed from consideration in order for external
control to work. Only when we're sufficiently disconnected from our
inner compass will we follow external demands. |
|
 |
"Get Rid of the Troublemakers"
 |
For "fear of chaos" social systems adopt the control
paradigm and run with it. Through all sorts of institutionalized policies, we get the
message that we are unacceptable the way we are, but that "if we surrender
ourselves to the social system of control (family, school, business, profession, religion)
"we'll become acceptable". The Soul is looked upon as
a "sloppy inefficient trouble- maker" that we would be better off without. |
 |
The more control systems zap our inner lives, the
less social order we have. It's a paradigm in crisis, creating neither personal
or global health. |
|
 |
Two Paradigm Conspiracies
 |
As long as the paradigm remains "invisible" we're stuck.
The prevailing model stymies change. It's the first paradigm conspiracy -- the
one that blocks our best efforts to confront crises and change. |
 |
The leap into "extraordinary science". The most
conspiratorial part of a paradigm shift is that it lie within each of us to do
it, but that we are essentially maintained in a state which keeps people from sharing
their effort to change. Movers and shakers are powerless to prevent constructive
change once many people start to hold a different viewpoint. |
|
|
 |
Making the Shift: By Death or Recovery?
 |
Paradigm shifts are scary precisely because we don't
know what's next. Control paradigm authorities claim that "soul-guided worlds
aren't possible - that they degenerate into anarchy". Challenging this cultural
belief involves a leap of faith.
 |
Plan A: Death
[ Addict-making paradigms lead to death ]
 |
Kuhn believed that paradigms permeate our consciousness so
thoroughly that the only way to get rid of them is for old paradigm practitioners to
die off. However, as a method for paradigm change, it lacks practicality,
particularly if you take reincarnation into account. |
 |
Either we let addictive paradigms die, or we die under the
addictive model. |
|
 |
Plan B: Recovery
 |
Using the Alcoholics Anonymous model of recovery from
addiction is a viable model to allow people to experience their personal paradigm in
crisis and then to embark on the journey of "extraordinary science" in order to
evolve their own models. |
|
 |
"Micro" (personal) recovery has limits within the
context of a larger defunct paradigm, because how can a person get healthy when the system
itself is sick? How can we make the paradigm revolution that our Soul requires as long as
our cultural paradigm conspires to sabotage our shift to internal guidance?
 |
As long as social systems continue to operate on a control
paradigm, they reinforce habits that put Soul needs last, because that's
how we're controllable. |
 |
Sick paradigms make sick institutions that make sick people
-- and then reward us for not noticing how sick we have become. |
|
 |
Getting to the paradigm-cause of social illness.
 |
Social systems resist because the control paradigm hiding in
the shadows won't allow system-wide transformation to occur. |
 |
Micro-recovery is where the process of paradigm revolution starts. |
 |
Getting to the root of these patterns, we question the paradigm
behind them and then move away from it. |
 |
The social systems requiring people to behave
in soul-disconnected ways must also change. |
 |
Belief structures, rules, methods and goals (the paradigm)
that requires "soul loss" to "create a healthy society" must be
changed. |
|
|
|
 |
RECOVERY - What it is and isn't.
 |
What recovery is
 |
Recovery is holistic, relating to the big picture,
the whole of creation. Our personal traumas are related to the systems arounf us, because
we're adopted their paradigm as well. How our social systems "think" has become
the way we "think" |
|
 |
What recovery is not
 |
Recovery is not about "fixing people".
The fact that we feel this way doesn't mean there is something "wrong"
with us. There is something right in that we notice the consistent wounding
of our inner lives and that we can't tolerate it any more. |
 |
Recovery is not about "getting rid of bad
habits". Looking at it in terms of "habits" alone bypasses the whole
point about the crisis in the paradigm itself in which the "habit" exists. |
 |
Recovery is not about becoming
"normal". |
|
|
 |
We're not talking about "blame" -- We are talking
about accountability.
 |
The "Blame Dodge"
 |
In order to "get off the hook", control-paradigm
systems claim they're being "blamed". But, that's a dodge. Systems and their
"authorities" protect themselves by taking no responsibility for the
consequences of their behavior. They don't want the consequences known, and if it
does become know, they want to make sure they're not held "responsible".
The cry of "your blaming others" is a trick for keeping control paradigms in
place. A paradigm approach considers responsibility all the way around. |
 |
Example: The 1911 Triangle Shirtwaist Company fire which
killed 146 and injured 70. Response was to "pin the blame", not seek
accountability. But, several changes were made in the paradigm to provide for
increased worker safety. |
|
 |
Paradigm Accountability
 |
Although individuals and social institutions are held
accountable, its the paradigm that is at the root of any accountability for action,
because it is the paradigm that creates the context in which events occur. |
 |
If a paradigm requires doing emotional violence to
individuals from the time they're born and institutionalizes humiliation as the way to
achieve "social order", then tragedies are bound to follow. |
|
|
 |
Personal Recovery as a Personal Paradigm Shift. With
responsibility comes the choice to shift models.
 |
Soul pain is often reflective of paradigm crisis and must be
acknowledged as such.
 |
Shifts in models of consciousness can often be painful. The
trick with recovery is to trace the pain back to the paradigm model that makes all of us
less than who we are, not to other people or circumstances. |
 |
When the pain becomes too much, people often resort to
addictions |
|
 |
Spiritual Awakening and Recovery Processes
 |
Recovery processes also involve a process of spiritual
awakening, and constitute a profound shift to a paradigm that honors who we are, and
unveils the truth underneath the roles we have assumed. |
 |
Supported by a paradigm of Soul-Connectedness, we come to
trust the inner self enough to follow it on a path of spiritual awakening, |
|
 |
Creativity
 |
As we make a paradigm shift, we experience an
explosion of creativity. Stepping out of the control-defined "norm", we begin
doing what we love and following inner guidance. |
|
|
 |
Not Stopping With Personal
Paradigm Shifts
 |
Social Systems: The Means of
Control
 |
A snag to the relative success of personal paradigm shifting
is the system snag, since we are surrounded by a social system which is
the means of control. Our current social system components function as
"emissaries" of the control paradigm, sent to render the population as
controllable. The function of the current social system is to make people obedient
and compliant. |
|
 |
Soul- Violating Family Systems
 |
Very violent children are almost always frequent recipients
of severe punishment at home, and this violence breeds more violence |
 |
Abusive executives and CEOs don't exploit employees and
customers without help from their family upbringing which entrained those kind of
principles as viable options for problem solving. |
|
 |
Soul-Violating Social Systems
|
|
|